The Photon Hole Darkness Hypothesis

This Text Is Darkness & Blackness Model # 5, Envisioned In May, 2001. The History Of All This Darkness Work Can Be Viewed At: http://www.johnkharms.com/Black.htm . All Of The Author's Work In The Darkness/Blackness Area Is Linked From The "History" Text, Via The Index Page Or Also At The Links At The End Of This Text.

The Unification Of Matter, Gravity And Darkness

How Can Massless Photon Holes Be Darkness?

By: John K. Harms

Email: harmsjk3@earthlink.net

Go To HOME

Abstract:

This text is the next step in the evolution of the author's thinking about darkness and blackness. It is derived from his past electromagnetic work. The main premise is that there are two types of massless photons at the speed of light; ordinary photons and photon "holes". Two images are provided within the text to place these statements into proper perspective. The photon holes, when massless, are viewed as being darkness photons (or D-photons); the stimuli responsible for the perception of darkness and blackness. These can also be shown to carry the gravitational force, granting negative impulses between the bodies that emit them. These observations tend to unite gravity, darkness and also matter. Matter is viewed as essentially photon holes with mass. Hence, darkness may be massless matter! When they interact with the material photoreceptors, D-photons may create resonances leading to a positive current resonance in the various visual areas of the brain. Photons, because they are positive energy (while matter is negative) tend to dampen these resonances in the brain. The detection of light by the brain and visual system is, therefore, a dampening effect (a reduction in current); not one based upon a positively reinforced resonance. The probable consequences of this model are discussed.

Key Words: Darkness Photons (D-photons), Darkness, Blackness, Photon Holes, Photons, Electromagnetic Field, Resonance, Massless

Introduction

One of the deeper consequences of the author's work on photon emission is that there appears to be two types of photons; ordinary photons and photon "holes". Both types of photons travel together as a mixture in space surrounding the zero-point of the "field" at the speed of light. The wavelike behavior of light can be understood as an interaction of these photons with their opposite photon holes. This is described in detail in the "Space-Grid" text at the link below. It can be understood that since both types of particles are massless, they are not in coordination with the Higg's or a similar mechanism which grants mass to the particles. Hence, photons and photon holes have no rest mass.

So, there appears to be photon holes that accompany the photons in space creating the wavelike qualities of a photon's pathway through space. The bigger questions appear to be: what is the nature of these massless photon holes? Do they create physical effects beyond simply "blazing" wavelike photon pathways in space? To answer the first question above requires a bit of probing into the author's somewhat long-chain of reasoning on this subject. The answer to the second question appears to be a definite "yes" --photon holes creating resonances in the visual system, the perceptual brain-state known as blackness sent by the retinal photoreceptors.

The Space-Grid

The author pictures the electromagnetic field (or space-grid) as a fluctuating vector system back and forth in space. Space (or equivalently the electromagnetic field) is set into oscillation when a charged particle becomes disturbed. This is very close to the standard Maxwellian model complete with electric and magnetic vector components, except that photons (at the top) and photon holes (at the bottom) are included and are created when the grid oscillates. See the image below.

For this presentation we will largely ignore the "antimatter" and "matter" components (in the image below) as they do not apply, except to say that photon holes and matter are closely related as are photons with antimatter. The relationship of matter, photon holes, darkness as well as gravity will be described in more detail subsequently. See also the "Antimatter" or "Matter As Photon Holes" texts for further details at the links below.

Graphic Image # 1

A closer inspection of the Maxwellian "wave" image #1 above (when brought into oscillation) reveals that at any one point on the wave vector, the wave oscillates first up as a large amount of photons, then down as an identical quantity of photon holes. As the wave travels along down "X" (when the field becomes disturbed), the photons arise up to their amplitude out of the zero-point and travel on down the line with the wave as it propagates along. The same is true for the photon holes; they travel on the downside of "X" (in the image) as the wave propagates along. All waves travel in this fashion.

In an actual electromagnetic disturbance without any polarization, there are oscillations in all directions about the zero-point of both photons and photon holes. Hence, in actual electromagnetic waves in space, both photons and negative energy holes mix together in all directions surrounding the zero-point.

So, the key question is: what precisely are these photon holes that travel at c? It can be understood through a symmetrical analysis that massless photon holes at c are essentially identical to massless backward-in-time photons that travel at c. It can also be noted that when they are emitted outward from a body, such photon holes may grant a negative push to any object that the hole comes into contact with--identical to quantum gravity.

So, if bodies do exchange photon holes with each other, they can impart a gravitational attraction to each other as well. It can be understood as well that since: Photons + Photon Holes = 0, that photon holes also must contain negative energy as mentioned above (if the photons have positive energy--which they indeed must!). Hence, gravitons may be in essence photon holes, each quantum of which contains negative energy.

The key insight of this text, an idea that the author finds absolutely plausible, is that photon holes are essentially "darkness photons". This darkness photon idea is key also to understanding the interactions taking place within the electromagnetic field. The author has performed extensive research on the darkness problem; see the darkness/blackness links below for more of the author's ideas on this subject.

As stated above, these (photon hole) darkness photons (or for simplicity; "D-photons") would contain negative energy and momentum, travel backward-in-time from ordinary photons at the speed of light and cancel-out ordinary photons when there is an interaction of precisely opposite energies. The spin is also opposite to that of an ordinary photon. So, not only may a photon hole (D-photon) impart gravity as a negative impulse to a massive body, but they may also be completely dark and/or impart the perception of darkness to the photoreceptors embedded within the retinas of our eyes.

Although one might conclude (incorrectly) that this is simply another fancy way of saying that the darkness is the absence of light, it actually is not because, in this case, the darkness must always be quantized. Darkness is, therefore, discontinuous and grainy. The absence of a photon graininess described here, thus, has particle-like qualities (spin, momentum, energy, frequency and direction-in-time). The simple "absence of light" description has no such characteristics at all, only an absolute lack of description that simply leaves one wondering; is that all there is to the darkness is the absence of light?

So, if one accepts such "hole" particles as being as "real" as photons are (and the author does), then the function of photon holes in the electromagnetic field is to add blackness (or darkness) to the backdrop of all of visual reality. Thus, blackness must be mixed in with all of the external physical aspects of visual experiences. How can this be so?

Darkness As Photon Holes At C

Now wait a minute, I thought you said in previous papers that ordinary matter was composed of photon holes; now you are saying that darkness is? What's going on here?

In the particle zoo, there are massless particles and also particles with mass. The essential difference here is that matter is a photon hole composite structure of holes that have mass and inertia. That is, ordinary matter as composite structures of photon holes is in compliance with the frequencies associated with the Higg's or a similar mechanism that creates their mass.

Darkness photons (or the photon holes we are talking about here) are fundamentally massless particles. They, therefore, do not interact with the frequencies of Higg's mechanism (and are not affected by it), so they do not have mass. Hence, these type of photon holes are simply aspects of space itself when it is brought into oscillation.

When the space-grid vibrates, photon holes are produced along with the photons as in the image # 1 above. So, both darkness and light (as effects upon human beings) are components of space itself, when that space is brought into oscillation. Thus, both the photons and photon holes that are produced are in essence massless particles. This can be understood in the following graphical image # 2:

Note in the above image # 2 that there are two types of photons that operate at c (photons and photon holes-- D-photons) and that at the Higg's frequencies each type of particle can drop below c and become possibly the building blocks for matter and antimatter. In addition, when different mediums are present through which the photons or photon holes pass, they can change both their directions of time and energy states (positive or negative). A photon then becomes a photon hole and a photon hole can be transformed into an ordinary photon at above the vacuum speed of light c. This idea is in accordance with the special theory of relativity.

It can be stated (and this, in the author's opinion, is a very interesting thought) that the primary difference between darkness and ordinary matter (as seen above also) is that ordinary matter has mass, whilst the darkness does not! Thus, darkness may be simply massless matter! Or, viewed the other way round; matter may be darkness particles with mass! It must also be the case that "light" particles (photons) at the proper Higg's frequencies can become massive and may form the constituents of antimatter. In both cases above, this is simply due to the compliance or noncompliance with Higg's frequencies i.e., whether a particle acquires mass or it does not.

So, one can actually connect (or unify) photon holes with ordinary matter, darkness and gravity. So, photon holes can impart gravity. Massless photon holes at c can impart darkness perception. Massive photon holes below c can compose matter. There are some unifying symmetrical relationships here; relationships in conventional thought that are not usually recognized or appreciated.

Since it was seen previously that: Photon Holes + Photons = 0, it can now be further understood that in the context of an electromagnetic field disturbance that: Darkness + Radiation = 0. When darkness is given mass (perhaps, when it becomes aligned with the Higgs frequencies) to become a particle of matter, one arrives at the result in the author's previous works: Matter + Radiation = 0. See the "Interesting Symmetries" text at the link below for more discussions about these unique relationships.

The Darkness Spectrum

Since all electromagnetic waves must have photon hole components, there must be a spectrum of photon holes at all negative energies. Hence, at every frequency that a photon can exist on the electromagnetic spectrum, there must be an opposite energy, frequency and direction-of-time D-photon (or darkness photon) partner. This D-photon partner has associated with it, a negative cancellation energy and frequency i.e., - E = (h) - f.

Most all photons (except for a very narrow band) are not sensitive to our visual systems. They are completely invisible to us. However, our visual systems might be sensitive to negative energy D-photons (photon holes) at all wavelengths.

Where photons do turnoff the receptors (an experimental reality opposite from what one might think), the wide spectrum of darkness photons turn-on the receptors. This creates a constant current in darkness called the "dark current". These facts about the photoreceptors are discussed in greater detail in the previous darkness texts. See the darkness links below for more information.

To summarize the author's thoughts about matter and radiation waves and their interactions up to this point: since darkness photons (photon holes) are composed of negative energy and so is matter (being also photon hole structures, but with mass at below the speed of light), the negative energy dark photons (in this case) interacts with negative energy matter. If the frequencies do match (and there are D-photons at all frequencies on the EM spectrum), this should create a positive current (or resonance reinforcement) in the photoreceptors in darkness. This is commonly known by neuroscientists as the dark current.

Ordinary photons, therefore, do not create such a positive current resonance in the photoreceptors, because ordinary photons are positive energy which cancels when it interacts with negative energy matter (photon holes). When positive and negative resonances interact there can only be destructive interference and an overall reduction in the amount of current. One might view this reduction also as photons filling photon holes-- they cancel out if the energy is identical (and opposite). A somewhat strange consequence of this line of logic might be that positive energy ordinary photons only would positively reinforce (bring into resonance) material photoreceptors composed of antimatter.

The nature of the interaction of the material photoreceptors with darkness photons is identical to that of waves precisely inphase that can reinforce each other. Visible photons become detected by the photoreceptors because they tend to dampen this reinforcement created by the darkness photons. Darkness brings the receptors into resonance producing the current that brings also the appropriate brain areas into resonance. The extremely high sensitivity of the visual system is brought about by the dampening of the darkness resonances within the brain by visible light. See the "Brain As A Matter Wave System" and/or the other darkness texts at the links below.

Where there is an absence of visible light, the darkness/blackness background of photon holes simply fill in. Hence, when visible wavelengths are blocked by an object, those photon hole wavelengths not blocked (D-photons) rapidly fill in our perceptual gaps with blackness. Black objects are simply objects that absorb visible wavelength and let through D-photon wavelengths. Thus, the color of a black object is simply our perception of D-photons. This line of logic is somewhat identical to the other darkness texts. See these texts for a deeper analysis concerning this subject that will not be repeated again here.

It was noted earlier that there are vastly more wavelengths of photon holes (D-photon) than the very narrow band of visible light, so our perceptual gaps can always be filled in with blackness. Indeed, we can never escape the vast perceptual background of photon holes (D-photons) at such a wide variety of electromagnetic frequencies because they are never blocked by matter. However, one must always bear in mind that the background of photons and photon holes at c is always in balance adding always on the large scale to zero i.e., Darkness (photon holes) + Photons = 0.

It should be mentioned that although photon holes can exist at all the known frequencies on the electromagnetic spectrum, this does not mean that the actual frequencies of darkness perception resonances are actually this wide. There may be discrete bands some distance from each other on the spectrum at which photoreceptor resonances take place. These specific darkness frequencies are not precisely known to the author at present. There may be some clues to what these wavelengths might be, however.

For example, the visible light frequencies of accompanying photon holes (in the EM field) cannot actually be the darkness band of frequencies, because these visible photons are easily blocked or reflected by matter (and the accompanying photon holes must also be blocked along with the photons). Hence, since the photons can be blocked, so must the photon holes, as the integral aspect of the wave collapses in that particular direction.

In fact, any wavelengths on the electromagnetic spectrum that can become blocked (or weakened substantially) by an interaction with ordinary matter can never actually be the photon hole darkness wavelengths. So, this places some important limits on the probable candidate wavelengths for D-photons. In this text, however, the author does not wish to venture a guess (because it would only be a guess at best!) at what is the precise location on the electromagnetic spectrum that the wavelength (or wavelengths) of the darkness band. Again, matter must be absolutely transparent to these electromagnetic waves, both the photon as well as the photon hole darkness aspects of the wave.

One might also gain other clues to these wavelengths by analyzing the photoreceptor cells themselves (the receivers of the darkness photon resonances) and their resonant frequencies. The frequencies of the dark current itself may also shed some light on what these electromagnetic frequencies might possibly be. Further research into this area is needed.

It should be noted that in the case of the other senses, negative energy photon hole matter can interact with the same negative energy matter of the sense organs and this will also cause a similar current stimulation or resonance i.e., a positive reinforcement of negative energy matter with negative energy matter. More about this in the "Senses As Wave Systems" text at the link below.

Conclusion

The probable consequences of this model are as follows:

1) Photon holes exist alongside (and oppositely to) photons in the electromagnetic field. See graphic image # 1 above. The photon holes that exist in the field are in essence negative energy, backward-in-time photons. It is the author's proposal that these photon holes are darkness photons.

2) Darkness is equivalent to matter that is massless. See the description above.

3) Within the visual system, light dampens the resonances created by darkness. This resonance is called the dark current and is proven by experiments.

4) Darkness photons are detected by the visual system because negative energy reinforces negative energy. The dark current exists because both matter and darkness have negative energy and must, therefore, positively reinforce each other. Photons dampen the visual system (as in # 3 above).

5) Photons would positively reinforce a photoreceptor system composed of antimatter, whilst D-photons would dampen it.

Relevant Links

The History Of My Ideas On Darkness: http://www.johnkharms.com/Black.htm

The Accompaniment (Darkness) Model: http://www.johnkharms.com/darkness.htm

The Infrared (Darkness) Hypothesis: http://www.johnkharms.com/infrared.htm

Photon Emission: http://www.johnkharms.com/photon.htm

The Space-Grid: http://www.johnkharms.com/grid.htm

Antimatter: http://www.johnkharms.com/antimatter.htm

Matter As Photon Holes: http://www.johnkharms.com/matter.htm

Interesting Symmetries: http://www.johnkharms.com/symmetry.htm

The Brain As A Matter Wave System: http://www.johnkharms.com/wave-brain.htm

The Senses As Wave Systems: http://www.johnkharms.com/senses.htm

Go To HOME

Reader's Note: Proper References And/Or Acknowledgments To This Text Are Appreciated.